Study Design. Prospective, observational multicenter clinical study. Objective. Evaluated cervical spine fusion using a 5-factor scale following multi-level ACDF. Secondary assessments included patient-reported outcome measures for pain and function and complications. Summary of Background Data. Multi-level cervical degenerative spine disease causes pain, instability, and neurological impairment often requiring ACDF. Autologous bone poses harvesting challenges requiring consideration of alternatives such as allogenic and synthetic grafts. ViviGen® cellular bone matrix, containing osteoblasts, osteocytes and bone lining cells, exhibits osteogenic potential making it an option for bone fusion. Evaluating bone fusion from imaging remains a challenge, with no scientific consensus on assessment criteria. Methods. 95 patients with 2- or 3-level ACDF enrolled between July 2016 and July 2018 in a multi-center, prospective study. Follow-up occurred at 6 weeks as well as 3, 6, 12, and optionally at 24 months. Standard ACDF approach was followed with interbody allograft spacer supplemented with ViviGen® cellular bone matrix and cervical plating. Statistical analysis included chi-square, t-test, and ANOVA tests. Results. 5-factor successful fusion rates ranged from 63.8% to 77.6% for the C3-C4 to C6-C7 levels (73.0% overall). Single factor-based successful fusion ranged from 72.4% to 99.5% with bridging bone endplate to endplate present at 80.1% of levels at last follow-up based on independent assessment. CT analysis of a subset of patients identified 96% of levels fused. NDI, SF12 PCS, and VAS scores all improved significantly ( P <0.05) during the follow-up period. Complications were limited and manageable. Only translational motion ≤1.25 mm correlated positively with a clinical outcome (SF12-PCS) on univariate analysis. Conclusion. This study demonstrated favorable fusion outcomes after 2- or 3-level ACDF procedures using a lineage-committed cellular matrix using a rigorous 5-factor scale. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvement in pain and function. Consensus for fusion criteria assessing true bone graft efficacy is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: