Within cinematic representations of genocide during the Second World War, attention has been heavily concentrated on the Holocaust, while the Samudaripen (also known as the Porajmos/Pharrajimos) has often been overlooked. Directed by Tony Gatlif, Korkoro ( Liberté , 2009) is one of the few narrative features to address this history and offers an alternative to the dominant historical narrative. Michel Foucault’s concept of “counter-memory” aims to reveal the events and subjects that official historiography has rendered forgotten. Gatlif’s film constructs a counter-memory by centering the experiences of those pushed to the margins of the dominant historical narrative. Hamid Naficy’s concept of “accented cinema” refers to films made by directors in exile, migration, or diaspora. The combination of these two approaches enables analysis of both the film’s political content and its cinematic form. This study aims to analyze the film through a synthesis of Foucault’s counter-memory and Naficy’s accented cinema, further informed by Zygmunt Bauman’s and Hannah Arendt’s accounts of modernity and statelessness, focusing on key components, namely, visual style, narrative structure, characters, subject matter/theme/plot, structure of feeling, and the filmmaker’s location. The study examines which elements of accented cinema the film draws upon in constructing its counter-memory. The analysis shows that Korkoro reconstructs the Samudaripen as a counter-memory and makes it visible through elements of accented cinema, transforming historical trauma into an aesthetic, sensory, and political form of resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
METİN et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: