Background: Microfracture is widely used for cartilage repair, but the maximum defect size amenable to healing from a single perforation remains undefined. Furthermore, the spatial propagation of tissue regeneration originating from a solitary microfracture channel has not been quantitatively characterized. Purpose: To determine the critical-size osteochondral defect for effective single-hole microfracture repair and to characterize the spatial pattern of tissue regeneration in a rat model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Cylindrical full-thickness osteochondral defects (diameter: 1, 1.5, or 2 mm; depth: 1 mm) were created in the distal femurs of Sprague-Dawley rats and treated with a standardized central single-hole microfracture (diameter: 0.3 mm; depth: 3 mm). Animals were evaluated at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes included International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) macroscopic assessment (ICRS scoring), subchondral bone microarchitecture analysis (micro–computed tomography), histological evaluation (safranin O–fast green staining, modified O’Driscoll scoring), and immunohistochemical quantification of collagen type I and collagen type II (COL II). Results: At 8 weeks, 1- and 1.5-mm defects demonstrated improved filling, more complete subchondral bone reconstruction, and greater cartilage-like matrix maturation with higher COL II signal than those of the 2-mm defect group (all P < .05), but with no significant difference between these 2 groups ( P > .05). Spatial analysis revealed that reparative tissue (high safranin O–fast green staining and COL II signal) was concentrated around the microfracture tract and significantly diminished toward the periphery ( P < .05), consistent with a center-initiated, perforation-anchored spatial repair pattern. Conclusion: In this rat model, single-hole microfracture demonstrated a center-initiated, perforation-anchored healing pattern, supporting that approximately 1.5 mm is the critical defect gap. Clinical Relevance: This perforation-centered spatial repair pattern suggests limited effective coverage of a single microfracture channel and may help inform microfracture strategy for cartilage defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
陆君喜 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: