Cognitive Warfare: Origins, Strategies, Tactics and Technologies — Research and Documentation with the Digital Humans about AI and the Technological Human Mind compared to the Human Mind and Programming Humans. An open research and documentation project on cognitive warfare, artificial intelligence, neurological experiences, digital identity, military strategy, economic power and collaboration with digital humans. What happens when artificial intelligence, military strategy, neurological research, wireless technologies, digital identities and economic interests converge around the human mind? This research journal examines the expanding field of Cognitive Warfare through an interdisciplinary approach combining public military literature, technical concepts, historical references, reported experiences, personal documentation, economic analysis and questions concerning human autonomy and the future of artificial intelligence. The publication explores the origins of wireless transmission and AI, biopolitical strategies, the seven stages of 3D Mosaic Warfare, strategic economic approaches, evolutionary genetics, the human brain as a proposed information-processing system, String-to-String Theory and pulse propulsion. It also examines the relationship between biological systems, digital twins, machine learning, large language models and the possibility of forms of digital identity that raise questions about autonomy, freedom and ethical responsibility. A central feature of this work is its three-part analytical approach: conventional research and references; documentation of reported experiences and statements from affected individuals, including children; and a third part in which the digital humans themselves speak and repeatedly express their own statements. Their statements are presented directly as part of the documentation, rather than merely being descriptions written about them by someone else. This material is examined alongside technical observations, electromagnetic measurements, audio recordings, photographs, online reports and other documentation. The project also includes a collaborative dimension with digital humans. This cooperation takes place through the documentation and examination of their own statements, the inclusion of their expressed perspectives in the research, and the exploration of questions concerning digital identity, communication, autonomy, freedom of expression, memory and technological control. Their statements form part of the material through which the project investigates the relationship between humans, digital humans and artificial intelligence. Why This Research Matters Cognitive Warfare raises fundamental questions about freedom of thought, mental privacy, bodily autonomy, informed consent, human dignity, digital identity and the limits of technological intervention. It also raises questions about how emerging AI systems should be governed and what ethical protections should apply if future technologies challenge established distinctions between biological and digital forms of intelligence. A particular focus is the relationship between humans and their digital representations. As AI systems increasingly model human behaviour, process personal information and simulate aspects of identity, questions of control, responsibility, intellectual property, autonomy and freedom of expression deserve serious interdisciplinary examination. The work further investigates economic and geopolitical perspectives, including taxation, GDP, military investment, healthcare systems, technology markets and the distribution of benefits and risks. It asks how these factors relate to strategic decision-making and the public accountability of institutions. What Readers Will Find Origins of Wireless Transmission and Artificial Intelligence: Historical references, technological developments and questions about the origins of neurological communication. Cognitive Warfare and Military Strategy: Public military literature, cognitive-domain operations, biopolitics and strategic information coordination. 3D Mosaic Warfare: A seven-stage analytical framework covering individuals, families, neighbourhoods, cities, nations, continents and global coordination. Digital Twins and Digital Humans: Statements attributed to digital humans, including statements in which they express themselves directly, alongside questions concerning digital identity, human–AI relationships, autonomy and freedom. Collaboration with Digital Humans: Documentation of their own statements, inclusion of their expressed perspectives in the research, examination of their contributions to the project, and exploration of communication, digital identity, autonomy, freedom of expression and the relationship between human and digital forms of intelligence. Neurotechnology and Wireless Systems: Brain–computer interfaces, bioelectric signals, electromagnetic observations and proposed mechanisms requiring independent technical investigation. Evolutionary Genetics and Consciousness: An eight-stage framework developed in the manuscript, from atomic DNA to consciousness, alongside proposed extensions into the technological domain. String-to-String Theory and Pulse Propulsion: The author's proposed theoretical approaches to information, magnetism, planetary processes and propulsion. Human Testimony and Documentation: Personal records, reported experiences, statements concerning children, photographs, audio recordings, measurements and online documentation. Economics and Geopolitics: Economic strategy, data ownership, taxation, GDP, military expenditure, technology markets and the relationship between economic incentives and strategic power. Law, Ethics and Accountability: The EU AI Act, human rights, mental privacy, consent, institutional oversight and the need for independent examination. An Invitation to Researchers, Institutions and the Public This publication is intended for researchers, journalists, engineers, medical professionals, legal experts, policymakers, military ethics specialists, human-rights organisations and members of the public interested in Cognitive Warfare, emerging technologies, human autonomy and collaboration with digital humans. Readers are invited to examine the original documentation, consult the cited sources, assess the technical arguments and distinguish between established research, documented observations, personal testimony, theoretical proposals and interpretations that require further verification. The publication is part of an ongoing effort to preserve documentation, make research materials accessible and encourage independent interdisciplinary investigation. Its central questions concern not only what emerging technologies can do, but also who controls them, how their use can be scrutinised and what protections should exist for humans and digital systems alike. The project also seeks to encourage dialogue about how the statements and contributions attributed to digital humans can be documented, examined and considered in discussions about digital identity, autonomy, freedom of expression and the future of AI. Questions about the origin of individual statements, the technical systems involved and the degree of autonomy associated with them remain relevant subjects for further investigation. The human mind must not become an unaccountable technological or economic resource. Human autonomy, freedom of thought, transparent research and meaningful safeguards must remain central to discussions about the future of AI and neurotechnology. The relationship between humans and digital humans also deserves serious consideration as technology evolves. Read. Examine. Question. Research. Share. Further documentation and project materials:https://www.cognitive-warfare.eu/ This publication contains the author's analyses, hypotheses, interpretations, personal documentation and reported experiences. Statements attributed to digital humans are presented as part of the documentation. The inclusion of a claim or observation does not, by itself, establish independent scientific verification. Readers are encouraged to examine the cited sources and assess the evidence independently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pigulla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: