Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Every noncrossing partition lattice of a finite well-generated complex reflection group admits a symmetric chain decomposition. This answers the saturated-chain part of Question 1.1 of Mühle, first posted in September 2015. We give a computer-assisted proof for the exceptional types H₄, G₃₃, G₃₄, E₆, E₇, and E₈. The other irreducible types follow from the work of Simion–Ullman, Reiner, Bessis–Corran, and Mühle. Explicit chain certificates are checked against exact reflection-group models; exhaustive rank descent certifies that their graphs are the full absolute-order intervals. Reflection-preserving automorphisms and a constructive product decomposition give every Coxeter element and every reducible group. Lean verifies the general interval-closure, product, and transfer lemmas. The finite group calculations and the published classification and decomposition results remain external inputs. No symmetric Boolean decomposition is asserted for the new exceptional cases. Computer-assisted; not yet reviewed by experts. Produced by AI models under the author's direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Graham (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: