BACKGROUND: Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of cancers for which a primary site cannot be identified. The diagnostic pathway is often protracted and resource-intensive, with little known about the costs involved. The primary aims of this study were to (a) determine time-to-treatment-decision (pathway duration) and (b) estimate resources incurred and direct healthcare costs within the UK's diagnostic pathway. METHODS: A microcosting analysis was conducted on 370 patients with CUP. For relevant context, a comparison cohort of 216 patients with stage IV cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) was selected. Pathways were mapped from the first cancer-related investigation until treatment decision. Analyses estimated pathway duration and cost, and explored the significance of prognostic variables on the CUP pathway. RESULTS: Median pathway duration in CUP was 40% longer than CCA (2.8 months vs 2.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001). Mean per-patient cost of the CUP pathway was 62% higher than CCA (£3902 vs £2403 respectively, p < 0.001). Performance status 0-1 and squamous-cell histology were predictive of higher costs in CUP. CONCLUSIONS: Direct healthcare costs were significantly higher in CUP. Improvements are required to rationalise investigations and facilitate patients receiving treatment in an appropriate timeframe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spurgeon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: