This article examines the paradox whereby semi-peripheral states articulate anti-colonial rhetoric and calls for global justice internationally, while deploying contradictory practices closer to home. Focusing on Azerbaijan after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, it proposes the concept of strategic hybridity to explain how Azerbaijan selectively rejects the Western-dominated liberal order by leveraging postcolonial nationalism, while seeking to gain a more advantageous place in the unequal economic structures on which that order rests. The article places Azerbaijan’s anti-colonialism in conversation with the political economy of the global green transition, showing how seemingly emancipatory agendas are mobilized by an assemblage of state and non-state actors to legitimize authoritarian peace. The article builds on qualitative data issued from fieldwork and the analysis of secondary sources. Overall, it advances a multi-scalar approach for understanding how contemporary (ab)uses of anti-colonialism are constituted through the interaction of global capitalism, state policies and civil society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Luciani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: