Lighting conditions can alter thermal perception, but the magnitude of these shifts on a temperature-equivalent scale is uncertain when physiological state is measured concurrently. This secondary analysis re-examined climate-chamber data from 54 young Japanese women exposed at 26°C, 28°C and 30°C to 30 combinations of illuminance (100 lx to 2900 lx) and correlated colour temperature (CCT; 2800 K to 5200 K). Conduction-corrected modified effective temperature (ETF) was used to express lighting-related differences in thermal appraisal. Mean skin temperature showed no consistent lighting-related shift. At neutral visual thermal sensation, ETF-equivalent values for six illuminance levels spanned approximately 2°C, with a maximum difference of 1.7°C between 250 lx and 1700 lx; however, the values were non-monotonic and bootstrap confidence intervals were wider than the ETF range studied. CCT showed no statistically supported association with visual thermal comfort. The ETF-equivalent values therefore describe perceptual appraisal rather than a change in physical temperature or thermophysiological heat balance. Under these short, near-neutral exposures, illuminance may influence thermal appraisal, but the present data are insufficient to support specific lighting or HVAC control recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurazumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: