The expansion of urban water supply networks has exacerbated leakage issues, necessitating prompt assessment and optimization of network operations. To address the limitations of traditional steady-state hydraulic analysis, this study proposes an integrated leak-state identification framework combining transient pressure prediction and pattern recognition. A hybrid model was developed to predict instantaneous pressure variations by integrating convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and an attention mechanism. Given laboratory normal and leakage conditions, the CNN-LSTM-Attention model achieved mean absolute error (MAE) values of 0.007815 ± 0.000283 kPa and 0.005345 ± 0.000324 kPa , root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.008450 ± 0.000281 kPa and 0.005457 ± 0.000321 kPa , and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) values of 0.95961±0.00265 and 0.93274±0.00776, respectively. The proposed model outperformed CNN, LSTM, bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and CNN-LSTM models. Subsequently, an optimized support vector machine (SVM) model was constructed for leak-state identification using transient monitored pressure and the CNN-LSTM-Attention predictions, achieving an accuracy of 97.50%, precision of 100.00%, recall of 94.74%, specificity of 100.00%, and F1-score of 97.30% in laboratory testing. Furthermore, the proposed framework was validated using data from a real-world water supply network. Given field conditions, the pressure prediction model maintained an R 2 of 0.91895, whereas the optimized SVM achieved accuracy of 92.50% and an F1-score of 91.89%. Although model performance decreased due to operational variability and more complex hydraulic conditions, the framework still demonstrated feasible pressure prediction and leak-state identification capability given monitored field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: