The present paper presents evidence against the notion that true contingency learning effects are only possible when participants are consciously aware of the pairings, as has been argued in a series of recent papers. We present a novel variant of the colour-word contingency learning paradigm designed to eliminate (or minimize) the influence of stimulus-response binding confounds. Within each of three sets of words, each word was presented most often in one colour. Participants cycled through the three sets of words in such a way that words never repeated within close proximity (between 6 and 10 intervening items). In a series of mixed models controlling for immediate colour repetitions, long-distance word-response repetitions, and item-level objective awareness, contingency learning effects were consistently observed. Most importantly, a robust contingency learning effect was not only observed for "aware items", but also for "unaware items" after controlling for the above-mentioned repetition effects. This represents clear evidence for implicit learning. That is, even when participants do not try to learn and do not develop conscious awareness of the pairings, a robust contingency learning effect is still observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: