The article interprets cybersecurity not as a collection of technical safeguards but as a social ethos integrating rights, duties, trust and mutual care. It identifies the victim-blaming risk of turning individual caution into absolute responsibility. A multi-level architecture of responsibility is proposed across corporate design, data protection and state guarantees. Responsibility is argued to be proportional to authority, resources, foreseeability and capacity to mitigate harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nigoraxon To'raxo'jayevna Buzrukova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: