The accelerating digitalization of schooling has reframed what it means to teach learners with disabilities. Special education teachers are now expected to combine traditional pedagogical expertise with assistive technology fluency, data literacy, and the socio-emotional sensitivity demanded by inclusive classrooms. This article presents a systematic literature review (SLR) that maps the future-ready skills required by special education teachers in the digital era. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 protocol, the search was conducted across three databases, namely Scopus, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO, using a Boolean string built around the constructs of future skills, special education teachers, and the digital era. After identification (n = 563), screening, and eligibility assessment, sixteen empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025 in indexed journals were retained for thematic synthesis. The analysis surfaced five interrelated competency clusters: (1) digital and assistive technology skills, (2) inclusive pedagogical skills, (3) socio-emotional and behavioral skills, (4) lifelong learning and adaptability, and (5) collaboration and interdisciplinary skills. Bibliometric mapping revealed concentration in Spain, the United States, and Indonesia, with the DigCompEdu and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) frameworks dominating conceptualization. Persistent gaps include the under-representation of low-resource contexts, fragmented teacher-preparation pathways, and limited integration of artificial intelligence within special education programs. The review contributes a competency synthesis that can inform curricular reform, professional development design, and policy aimed at preparing teachers who can deliver equitable, technology-enhanced instruction to learners with diverse needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: