This paper analyzes how India and Indonesia, two of the most populous countries in the Indo-Pacific, characterize and mitigate disinformation. By comparing state rhetoric at key United Nations forums (the OEWG and the Ad Hoc Committee) against regional guidelines and domestic legislative measures, we identify a shift toward “digital sovereignty.” While both nations champion human rights globally, their domestic frameworks typify disinformation as a national security threat and enable centrally coordinated content control. This study concludes that these state-led information environments pose significant challenges to the right to free expression and complicate global cooperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poetranto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: