School-based caries programmes in Kenya that deploy silver diamine fluoride (SDF) by dental hygienists face a referral-timing problem: which lesions should be arrested in situ and which should be referred for restorative care, given that the decision rule itself determines the arrest rate a programme can report. the present analysis treats that decision as a design parameter rather than a clinical afterthought and characterises the operating characteristics of a before-after-control-impact (BACI) estimator for programme-level arrest rates under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.640). No observational data are used or claimed; the analysis is a replication-based evaluation across 2000 design cells defined by 8, 16, 24 and 32 clusters and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. Power was estimated for each cell, and the minimum detectable effect at 80% power was derived. Fifty-four clusters are required to detect a 5-percentage-point difference at 80% power under the declared variance structure. The results indicate that lesion-selection thresholds interact with cluster count in ways that make small programmes structurally unable to distinguish a genuine SDF effect from referral-driven case-mix change. Referral timing should be specified as an a priori design parameter in school caries programmes, and that the BACI estimator is defensible only when the threshold rule is held fixed across the before and after periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odhiambo Ouma Nyongesa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: