OBJECTIVES: Evidence on hysterectomy and the risk of type 2 diabetes is limited, particularly regarding age at surgery. We assessed whether hysterectomy, with or without bilateral oophorectomy, is associated with incident type 2 diabetes, and whether this association is modified by age at surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We followed 82,472 women from the E3N-Generations cohort, free of diabetes at baseline in 1992, until 2008 (median follow-up 16 years). Hysterectomy and oophorectomy were modelled as time-dependent exposures. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox models with age as the time scale, adjusted for lifestyle, metabolic, and reproductive factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2318 women developed type 2 diabetes. In fully adjusted models, hysterectomy combined with bilateral oophorectomy was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.43) compared with women who underwent neither procedure, whereas hysterectomy alone was not (1.06, 0.91-1.24). Bilateral oophorectomy alone was not associated with the risk of incident type 2 diabetes. The association with hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy was strongest among women operated on before age 45 (1.70, 1.35-2.15); it was similarly elevated when the age threshold was changed to 40 (1.54, 1.08-2.20). There was significant heterogeneity by age at surgery for hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy (p = 0.001) and for hysterectomy alone (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy was associated with an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes, independently of conventional metabolic risk factors. This excess risk was particularly pronounced among women who underwent surgery before age 45.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hachem et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: