Rationale Aberrant host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection causes severe lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with resultant multiorgan failure and death. Cyclosporine, a calcineurin inhibitor with potent immunosuppressant and direct antiviral properties, was hypothesized to reduce cytokine-driven injury in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. Objectives To evaluate whether cyclosporine improves time to recovery and reduces mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19, using the I-SPY COVID adaptive platform trial design. Methods In this phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, non-intubated and intubated adults with confirmed COVID-19 requiring ≥6L/min oxygen received oral cyclosporine 5mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 5 days, added to standard backbone therapy (dexamethasone and remdesivir), or standard therapy alone. Co-primary endpoints were time to recovery and time to death, assessed using Bayesian proportional-hazard models with pre-specified graduation thresholds. Results Of 238 randomized patients (110 cyclosporine, 128 control), 28-day recovery rates were 65.9% vs. 71.1% and 28-day mortality rates were 10.7% vs. 11.3%, respectively. The posterior probability that cyclosporine improved recovery was 6% (graduation threshold >97.5%) and that it reduced mortality was 59.6% (graduation threshold >90%), meeting neither pre-specified efficacy criterion. Serious adverse events were more frequent with cyclosporine (17.3% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.016). No significant differences in inflammatory plasma biomarkers were observed between groups. Conclusions Cyclosporine did not meet pre-specified efficacy thresholds for recovery or mortality in severe COVID-19 ARDS and was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events. These results do not support its addition to standard care in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haczku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: