Helium leak detection is one of the essential methods for current battery pack enclosure sealing performance testing. However, owing to the absence of a quantitative criterion for assessing helium mixing uniformity, the helium leakage detection method is compelled to adopt a conservative testing cycle of 375 seconds (300-second pre-mixing followed by 75-second sampling), which constitutes a major limitation of this approach. This study comparatively evaluates fan-array flow configurations within a seal-testing bench using three-dimensional transient computional fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Four initial flow topologies were compared, among which the cyclone layout provided the strongest transport but generated a vortex stagnation core at the geometric center. Three refined cyclone-derived configurations were then proposed to destabilize this core. The quadrantal antagonistic circulating layout achieved a better performance by breaking the geometric symmetry of the fan array. For the quadrantal antagonistic circulating layout, the predicted average t 90 over four leakage locations was 122.6 seconds, and the corresponding simulation-based testing cycle was reduced by 59.2% compared with the conservative 375-second procedure. The average leakage rate was 10.05 sccm, with an error of only 0.5%. The simulation-based testing cycle evaluation method established in this article provides a numerical basis for shortening the cycle of the helium detection process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: