COMMUNICATION XIX-B - CAN YOU FEEL OUR PAIN? - WHO ARE WEₒ? - HOW CAN WE REPRESENT OURSELVES?

FHESS COMMUNICATION XIX-B — INSTITUTIONAL CARE ACCOUNTABILITY, JUDICIAL SOLIDARITY AND THE ICC CORNERSTONE FHESS COMMUNICATION XIX-B takes as its concrete point of departure a publicly reported case of hijab-related exclusion from education in Azerbaijan, the mother's prayer of lament concerning her daughter's position, and the public appeal associated with World Hijab Day. The Communication places this encountered case within an international configuration of hijab-related restrictions, exclusion from education, religious freedom, children's rights, secondary victimisation and access to justice across different national and institutional settings. The singularity of the encountered case is preserved while the international configuration opens a broader field of legal and scientific examination. Each person, State, judicial institution and competent authority occupies a differentiated position. The study develops the relationship between victim representation, timely judicial care, international judicial solidarity, shared legal expertise and institutional care accountability. Within TRIAS POLITICA 3.0 and TRIAS VERITATIS 3.0, the International Criminal Court is examined as an independent judicial cornerstone within the rule-of-law construction established through the Rome Statute. The Communication distinguishes scientific representation, the reception of information, legal competence and authoritative judicial determination. The accompanying Annexes A–J develop constitutional pragmatics, legal politics, jurisprudential innervation, decision-making centres, pressure points and dehybridisation. The doctrinal proposition is: Primary public materials: World Hijab Day-related LinkedIn publication: https://lnkd.in/p/enz44Fnb Additional LinkedIn publication: https://lnkd.in/p/eS5gr4X4