Terrestrial ecosystem risk is shaped by compound extremes that monthly indices can miss. We introduce the Compound Indicators for Vulnerable Ecosystems (CIVE), an 8-day, 0.125-degree framework separating hazard exposure from ecosystem vulnerability across the conterminous United States during 2000–2024. Fixed NLDAS-2 thresholds define a five-hazard catalogue. A target-year-excluded Dynamic-local reference built from up to ten nearest eligible non-hazard years defines expected GOSIF GPP. Exposure combines normalized event frequency and duration; vulnerability integrates impact magnitude, response time, recovery time, and relative resilience; risk is their geometric mean on joint support. GOSIF tracks 8-day AmeriFlux GPP ( r = 0.83, n = 8924), and event-scale losses agree between tower and grid estimates ( r = 0.78, n = 12). Across 25 annual records, national EI, VI, and RI average 0.023, 0.086, and 0.037. Their Sen slopes are +0.0024, −0.0018, and − 0.0002 decade −1 (Hamed–Rao p = 0.306, 0.870, and 0.981), providing no evidence of national trends. Sixteen overlapping 10-year windows show a modest positive EI direction and negative VI and RI directions, but these diagnostics are not independent because adjacent windows share nine years. Spatial contrasts persist: heatwave vulnerability and risk center on the Southwest and Southern Great Plains, flash-drought impacts extend through the Plains and upper Midwest, and cold-wave vulnerability is restricted to winter-active warm margins. Fixed-reference and alternative-window analyses show that temporal direction depends on method. CIVE supports hazard-specific spatial diagnosis, while national VI and RI trends remain unresolved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: