Purpose Lasers are an attractive alternative to mechanical tools for bone preparation, but clinical adoption is limited by low removal rates. This study investigated whether spatiotemporal sequencing of Er:YAG pulses can improve thermomechanical bone ablation, and how pulse separation and delivery order affect ablation rate, efficiency, and heating. Methods A prototype Er:YAG system, with galvanometer scanning, ablated cancellous bone in eight ex vivo lamb femurs. Arm 1 varied the separation between consecutive pulses (0.175 to 0.275 mm). Arm 2 compared four targeting patterns within a fixed pulse grid, maintaining constant fluence and total energy for three of the four patterns. Thermal imaging and pre/post confocal scans quantified heating and volumetric removal. Results Ablation rate was consistent across pulse separations (521 to 552mm 3 /min), while layer depth scaled linearly with deposited energy (R 2 = 0.94), decoupling depth control from throughput. Targeting strategy significantly affected ablation efficiency, ranging from 0.19–0.32mm 3 /J ( p < 0.001). Hatching was fastest and most efficient, sustaining consistently high peak surface temperatures (200–250 °C) but lower mean surface temperatures than either scatter strategy. Conclusion Ablation efficiency varied with pulse order under controlled conditions, indicating a dependence beyond single pulse dynamics. We propose inter-pulse thermal coupling, whereby residual heat from a preceding pulse lowers the energy required by the next. Optimising the targeting strategy achieved the fastest reported removal rate for cancellous bone, identifying pulse sequencing as a lever for more efficient ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Withers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: