Racial disparities in the incidence of, and mortality from, aggressive breast cancers are a pressing public health issue. Many factors have been investigated in these inequities; however, the role of toxicant exposures is not well characterized. We and others have identified substantial inequities in chemical biomarker concentrations by race. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that exposure to these chemicals is linked to biological changes relevant to aggressive breast cancers, such as dysregulation of the Hallmarks of Cancer. We used high-throughput transcriptomic profiling of normal primary human breast epithelial cells from diverse donors (n = 6) to test the effects of 8 chemicals (cadmium, lead, arsenic, copper, PFNA, BPA, BPS, and p,p’-DDE) with documented exposure disparities by race/ethnicity across 3 concentrations (100 nM, 1 μM, and 10 μM). Across chemicals, we identified that pathways related to cell cycle regulation and protein secretion were commonly affected. Through bioinformatic estimation of cell-type proportions, we found that metals like lead and cadmium induced cell-type shifts, consistent with the dysregulated cellular plasticity cancer hallmark. Lead- and arsenic-response genes were enriched for genes associated with poor breast cancer survival in the Cancer Genome Atlas. Integrating concentration–response modeling and chemical biomonitoring data, BPA, p,p’-DDE, copper, and lead elicited expression changes at concentrations relevant to the US population. Finally, we identified substantial interindividual heterogeneity in response to chemical classes, with heavy metals producing the largest dose-responsive transcriptional effects. These findings highlight the value of high-throughput transcriptomics as a new approach methodology (NAM) in quantifying how common exposures may impact aggressive breast cancer-associated biological processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: