BACKGROUND: : Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have reshaped breast cancer treatment, yet their efficacy and toxicity in older adults (≥65 years) remain poorly characterized. METHODS: : We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase (Elsevier) through November 17, 2025 for phase 2 or 3 randomized trials comparing ADCs versus non-ADC therapies in metastatic or early-stage breast cancer. The primary analysis assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic disease and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in early-stage disease, stratified by age (≥65 vs. <65 years), using pooled hazard ratios (pHRs). Age-by-treatment interaction was assessed using the ratio of HRs. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 3,045 records identified, 20 trials (14 metastatic, 6 early-stage; 13,055 participants, 18% aged ≥65 years) met inclusion criteria. In metastatic trials, ADCs improved PFS in both older (pHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.79) and younger participants (pHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.66), with no significant age-by-treatment interaction (pooled ratio of HRs, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.91-1.33). ADCs also improved OS in the metastatic setting, though no trial reported age-stratified OS. In early-stage trials, only two reported age-stratified IDFS, with discordant results precluding pooled analysis. Grade ≥3 AEs were reported across all trials, but only three provided age-stratified data, and none stratified AEs jointly by treatment arm and age. CONCLUSION: ADC efficacy in metastatic breast cancer was similar across age groups, though data in early-stage disease were limited. Insufficient age- and treatment-stratified toxicity reporting precludes meaningful safety assessment of ADCs in older adults with breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margolis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: