Vehicle-based measurement systems occupy an important niche in the multiscale methane measurement landscape between component-level technologies and aerial-based methods. Performance evaluations are often limited to one dimension (e.g., quantification), while methodological opacity limits interpretation and intercomparisons between technologies. Here, we develop a vehicle-based measurement unit employing repeated site-perimeter transects and a processing framework featuring a novel weighted-likelihood algorithm for automated source attribution. Using controlled release experiments at two dedicated testing facilities, we characterize system performance across three dimensions─detection, attribution, and quantification. The system achieved a 94.5% true-positive detection rate with no false positives and a 90% detection limit as low as 0.078 kg/h with five repeat transects. Attribution accuracy was high at the source-group level, reaching 99.7% in single-source releases and 86% in multisource scenarios. Quantification was unbiased for low-to-moderate complexity releases (2 source groups; slope = 0.99, R2 = 0.81) but overestimated under highly complex conditions (5 source groups; slope = 1.45, R2 = 0.91). These results provide a transparent performance benchmark, demonstrating that these systems are well-suited to survey the large populations of low-to-moderate-complexity sites (e.g., single wells and batteries), as a screening layer in LDAR applications, and to quantify the low end of emission distributions in inventories, reducing reliance on generic emission factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latimer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: