AIM: Guidelines for neonates presenting to the emergency department (ED) with fever, including fever at home, recommend a full septic work-up and prompt administration of parenteral antibiotics. However, compliance is unknown. We sought to determine rates of guideline compliance in this population, reasons for non-compliance and rates and outcomes of serious bacterial infection (SBI). METHODS: 38°C. We extracted and analysed hospital data from an electronic medical record for guideline compliance, reasons for non-compliance, rates of SBI, and clinical outcomes. Our primary outcome was the rate of guideline compliance. RESULTS: We included 475 patients, less than half (46.5%) of whom received guideline-compliant care. The primary contributor to guideline non-compliance was fever at home but no fever in the ED. Overall, 65/475 (15%) of patients had SBI, the majority of which were urinary tract infections (UTIs). 42/65 (64.6%) of patients with SBI had a confirmed concurrent viral infection. 107/475 (22.5%) were discharged home from ED, only one (0.9%) of whom was readmitted within 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of febrile neonates presenting to the ED receive guideline-compliant care, with the lowest compliance in infants who are febrile at home but not in the ED. Rates of SBI are high, and viral-bacterial co-infection is common. In some low-risk infants, a tailored approach to investigation and management may be suitable, though risk mitigation strategies and potential future guideline adaptation warrant further exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: