Background: Nurses’ resilience and psychological well-being are central to sustaining a healthy workforce, yet their relationships with toxic leadership remain poorly characterized in Saudi Arabia. Objective: To examine the associations of toxic leadership with resilience and psychological well-being among Saudi nurses and to compare the relative strength of these relationships. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted among 296 Saudi nurses in seven governmental hospitals in Hafr Al-Batin. Toxic leadership, resilience, and psychological well-being were measured using validated instruments. Spearman correlations and bootstrap structural equation models were used. Results: Toxic leadership was negatively correlated with resilience (r=−.601) and psychological well-being (r=−.517), both p<.01. Structural models showed significant negative associations with resilience (β=−.4800, p=.0015, R²=.380; 95% bootstrap CI −.7909 to −.2578) and psychological well-being (β=−.2879, p=.0010, R²=.233; 95% bootstrap CI −.5782 to −.1349). The psychological well-being model showed CFI=.8797, TLI=.8390, IFI=.8616, and RMSEA=.0756. The resilience model showed CFI=.8986, TLI=.8705, IFI=.8895, and RMSEA=.0708. A spirituality item concerning divine help had the highest resilience item mean (4.47/5). Conclusion: Toxic leadership was associated with lower resilience and psychological well-being. The findings provide new Saudi evidence and a culturally relevant indication that spirituality may be an important resilience resource. Longitudinal and multisource studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saad Aqeel Alshammari (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: