Key result
Videoscopic-guided substernal EV-ICD implantation achieves 100% first-pass lead placement without acute complications.
Why the study?
Substernal tunneling during extravascular ICD (EV-ICD) implantation has limited visualization, increasing the risk of pleural or pericardial injury and suboptimal lead placement. The safety and feasibility of a videoscopic-guided system (VSGS) to improve substernal access and lead positioning needed assessment.
Does a videoscopic-guided system (VSGS) improve safety and feasibility of substernal access and lead positioning in patients undergoing extravascular ICD implantation?
Observational (n=9)
Does a videoscopic-guided system (VSGS) improve safety and feasibility of substernal access and lead positioning in patients undergoing extravascular ICD implantation?
Using a videoscopic-guided system for substernal access during extravascular ICD implantation appears feasible and safe, enabling direct visualization and precise first-pass lead placement without acute complications in this initial 9-patient experience.
Supports feasibility of videoscopic substernal access without acute issues; leaves open whether it reduces injury risk versus standard technique.
Background The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) offers a less invasive alternative to transvenous systems while maintaining effective defibrillation. Substernal tunneling remains the most challenging step, as limited visualization increases the risk of pleural or pericardial injury and suboptimal lead placement. Objective We aim to assess the safety and feasibility of a videoscopic-guided system (VSGS) to improve substernal access and lead positioning during EV-ICD implantation. Methods Patients underwent EV-ICD implantation using video-assisted substernal access with VSGS. Through a left lateral xiphoid incision, a thoracoscope was advanced to directly visualize the substernum and pericardium. Under combined video and fluoroscopic guidance, a tunneling tool was advanced from the xiphoid along the retrosternal space, ensuring continuous visualization to avoid pleural or pericardial breach. The lead was then passed into the retrosternal space anterior to the right ventricle and connected to the generator in the lateral pocket Procedural metrics, lead parameters, and acute complications were recorded. Results Nine patients (42% male, mean age 57 ± 12 years) successfully underwent EV-ICD implantation using the VSGS approach. Direct substernal visualization and first-pass lead placement anterior to the right ventricle were achieved in all cases. No pericardial or pleural entry, vascular injury, or need for surgical conversion occurred. Mean fluoroscopy time was 8 ± 6 minutes, and total procedure time was 26 ± 8 minutes. Defibrillation thresholds were acceptable with stable electrical parameters, and no acute complications or major device-related events were observed. Conclusion Real-time visualization with VSGS enables precise substernal RV lead placement and enhances safety during EV-ICD implantation. This early experience demonstrates feasibility and safety, though larger studies are needed to confirm broader applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mraiyan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) implantation (n=9). Videoscopic-guided system (VSGS) for substernal access during EV-ICD implantation was evaluated on Successful EV-ICD implantation with first-pass lead placement and absence of acute complications. Videoscopic-guided substernal access for EV-ICD implantation achieved 100% first-pass lead placement (9/9) with 0% acute complications and a mean procedure time of 26 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: