Key result
Elevated left atrial coupling index is linked to ~16% higher risk of adverse outcomes.
Why the study?
Diagnosing HFpEF remains challenging due to a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses, and the left atrial coupling index (LACI) could serve as an echocardiographic marker to aid in diagnosis and prognosis.
Does echocardiographic left atrial coupling index (LACI) accurately diagnose and predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,689)
Does echocardiographic left atrial coupling index (LACI) accurately diagnose and predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF?
Echocardiographic left atrial coupling index provides high sensitivity (89%) and negative predictive value (93%) for ruling out HFpEF while independently predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
LACI may aid HFpEF evaluation and risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Introduction Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging due to a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses. The left atrial coupling index (LACI) integrates the volume of the left atrium and the left ventricle at end-diastole and could be an echocardiographic marker to aid in a more accurate diagnosis of HFpEF. Purpose We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis searching for studies that assessed the correlation between LACI values estimated by echocardiography and the diagnosis and prognosis of HFpEF. Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies that assessed the correlation between LACI values estimated by echocardiography and the diagnosis and prognosis of HFpEF. Diagnostic accuracy outcomes, sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were calculated and pooled using random-effects models to account for between-study heterogeneity. For prognostic outcomes, pairwise meta-analyses were conducted by pooling hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results A total of seven observational studies, encompassing 5,689 patients (1,354 with HFpEF), met the inclusion criteria. LACI demonstrated high sensitivity for diagnosing HFpEF, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI 0.57–0.95), as well pooled specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.67–0.93). NPV was consistently high, with a pooled estimate of 0.93 (95% CI 0.77–0.98; I²=98.6%) and PPV averaged 0.67 (95% CI 0.37–0.87; I²=98%). Elevated LACI was associated with a significantly higher risk of the composite outcome (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.07–1.25; p=0.0003, I²=0%) (Figure 1). The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis identified 28.4% as the optimal diagnostic threshold for the volumetric diastolic LACI (Figure 2). Conclusions LACI measure provides high diagnostic sensitivity with excellent rule-out capability and shows consistent association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF. While further validation is required, LACI holds promise as a practical imaging marker with potential to support earlier recognition, individualized risk stratification, and improved management of patients with HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacca et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=5,689). Elevated left atrial coupling index (LACI) vs. Lower or normal LACI was evaluated on Composite adverse cardiovascular outcome (prognosis) and HFpEF diagnosis (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.25, p=0.0003). Left atrial coupling index showed high sensitivity (0.89) and specificity (0.84) for diagnosing HFpEF, and elevated values predicted adverse outcomes (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.07-1.25; P=0.0003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: