Key result
Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was associated with lower incident CVD risk per 1-SD increase (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56–0.75), though incremental discrimination over components was limited.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether cardiometabolic composite indices offer consistent cardiovascular disease risk information beyond established clinical predictors and their constituent variables in adults with diabetes.
Do cardiometabolic composite indices such as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction beyond conventional clinical factors and their constituent variables in adults with diabetes?
Cohort (n=1,785)
Yes
Do cardiometabolic composite indices such as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction beyond conventional clinical factors and their constituent variables in adults with diabetes?
While higher estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is associated with lower incident cardiovascular disease in adults with diabetes and may identify residual risk in non-high-risk patients, it provides limited incremental discriminative value beyond its individual component variables and conventional predictors.
eGDR may flag residual CVD risk in diabetes; leaves open whether it improves prediction beyond conventional factors.
Although cardiometabolic composite indices have shown associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD), it remains unclear whether they offer consistent risk information beyond that captured by established clinical predictors and their constituent variables. We aimed to determine whether 12 cardiometabolic composite indices provide cardiovascular risk information beyond conventional clinical factors and their individual components in adults with diabetes. The primary analyses included 1290 CHARLS participants with diabetes and no CVD at baseline, who were separated into development and fixed test sets; the principal findings were subsequently examined in an independent sample of 495 ELSA participants. Associations with incident CVD, information overlap, selection stability, model contribution, and incremental predictive performance were systematically assessed, followed by exploratory risk-stratified analyses. Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) showed the most consistent risk signal. In CHARLS, each 1-standard-deviation increase in eGDR was associated with lower incident CVD risk (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56–0.75). Adding eGDR produced numerical increases in the C-index from 0.619 to 0.645 and the 9-year time-dependent AUC from 0.634 to 0.664, but paired bootstrap confidence intervals for these differences included zero, and eGDR did not clearly outperform its component variables. Among participants not classified as high risk, those with low eGDR comprised 36.4% of participants but accounted for 50.0% of subsequent CVD events; event proportions were 36.0% versus 20.6% (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.12–3.04). In ELSA, higher eGDR was also associated with lower overall CVD risk, and similar numerical patterns in discrimination and residual-risk enrichment were observed, although the stroke-specific association was less clear. Overall, eGDR showed limited incremental discrimination, while exploratory risk-stratified analyses suggested possible residual-risk enrichment among participants with low eGDR; this finding requires prospective validation using prespecified thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Diabetes without baseline cardiovascular disease (n=1,785). Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and 11 other cardiometabolic composite indices vs. Conventional clinical predictors and constituent component variables was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.75). Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was associated with lower incident CVD risk per 1-SD increase (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56–0.75), though incremental discrimination over components was limited.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: