Key result
Lattice-tip pulsed-field ablation linked to ~7 percentage points fewer repeat ablations than Farapulse.
Why the study?
Pulsed-field ablation has recently emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiofrequency ablation for AF, prompting a direct evaluation of the safety and efficacy of two PFA systems using either a pentaspline or a lattice-tip catheter.
Does pulsed-field ablation using a 9 mm lattice-tip catheter (Sphere-9, Affera) reduce repeat ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence compared to a pentaspline catheter (Farapulse) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time ablation?
Cohort (n=2,389)
Does pulsed-field ablation using a 9 mm lattice-tip catheter (Sphere-9, Affera) reduce repeat ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence compared to a pentaspline catheter (Farapulse) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time ablation?
In real-world patients undergoing first-time pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation, the 9 mm lattice-tip catheter system (Affera) demonstrated a significantly lower rate of repeat ablation for arrhythmia recurrence and lower posterior wall reconnection compared to the pentaspline catheter system (Farapulse).
Affera lattice-tip PFA was associated with lower repeat ablation rates than Farapulse; leaves open confirmation in randomized AF trials.
Introduction Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) with its characteristic high tissue-selectivity, has recently emerged as a promising alternative to the conventional radiofrequency ablation for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two systems using either a pentaspline or a lattice-tip mapping and ablation catheter. Methods Consecutive AF patients undergoing their first catheter ablation using the PFA system were included in the analysis and divided into two groups based on the ablation system used; Group 1: the pentaspline catheter (Farapulse Inc) and Group 2: 9 mm lattice- tip catheter (Sphere-9, AFFERA, Medtronic). All received isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW). High-dose isoproterenol challenge (up to 30µg/min) was used to disclose triggers in the LAPW by moving the circular mapping catheter along the PW down to the level of coronary sinus, which were targeted. Lower LAPW was defined as the area between the line joining the inferior borders of the inferior PV-encircling lesions and the coronary sinus. Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued after the 2-month blanking period. Arrhythmia-monitoring was performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months with clinic visits, interrogation of wearable devices, 12-lead ECG, 7-day Holter monitoring and event recorders. Patients were followed up for up to 1 year. Results A total of 2,389 patients (Gr. 1: 1816 and Gr. 2: 573) were included in the analysis. During follow-up, 309 (17%) patients from group 1 and 57 (10%) patients from group 2 underwent repeat ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence (p <0.001). Mean time to redo ablation was 5.1±2.2 and 5.6±2.3 months for group 1 and 2 respectively. At redo, PV reconnection was observed in 14 (4.5%) patients vs none (0%) in group 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.10). Reconnection in the ‘lower LAPW’ was seen to be significantly higher in group 1 vs 2 (241, 78%) vs 12 (21%) patients in group 2, p <0.001) (Figure 1). New ectopic triggers were detected in the superior vena cava (SVC) (16, 5.18%), lower crista (38, 12.3%), left atrial appendage (LAA) [76, 24.6%] and coronary sinus (CS) [81, 26.2%] in group 1 patients and LAA (19, 33.3%), CS (17, 29.8%), lower crista ( 4, 7%) and SVC (3, 5.2%) in group 2. Conclusion Findings from this study demonstrate a significantly higher success rate with the Affera ablation system. Moreover, among patients undergoing redo procedure, a significantly higher reconnection rate of the lower LAPW was observed in Farapulse cases compared to Affera.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohanty et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,389). 9 mm lattice-tip pulsed-field ablation catheter (Sphere-9, Affera) vs. Pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter (Farapulse) was evaluated on Repeat ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up (p=<0.001). Pulsed-field ablation with the Affera lattice-tip system had lower repeat ablation rates for arrhythmia recurrence than Farapulse (10% vs 17%; p<0.001) and less lower LAPW reconnection (21% vs 78%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from European Heart Journal