Key result
CCTA high-risk plaque linked to ~2-fold higher odds of OCT-defined thin fibrous cap.
Why the study?
High-risk plaque on CCTA predicts adverse events, while plaque rupture relates to fibrous cap thickness and clinical events to plaque burden. The association of CCTA-detected high-risk plaque features with OCT-measured fibrous cap thickness and IVUS-assessed plaque burden needed evaluation.
Does the presence of high-risk plaque features on coronary CT angiography predict thin fibrous cap on OCT and high plaque burden on IVUS in patients undergoing pre-intervention multimodality coronary imaging?
Observational (n=305)
Does the presence of high-risk plaque features on coronary CT angiography predict thin fibrous cap on OCT and high plaque burden on IVUS in patients undergoing pre-intervention multimodality coronary imaging?
Specific high-risk plaque features on coronary CT angiography differentially correlate with thin fibrous cap on OCT and high plaque burden on IVUS, which may help refine non-invasive risk prediction for plaque disruption and acute coronary syndromes.
Background/Introduction High-risk plaque (HRP) detected by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) may predict future adverse events. Studies showed that plaque rupture is mainly related to fibrous cap (FC) thickness, while clinical events are associated with plaque burden (PB). Purpose To evaluate the association of HRP features with FC thickness and PB using multimodality imaging. Methods Patients undergoing pre-intervention CCTA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were included. HRP was defined as a plaque with at least 2 of the following 4 features: positive remodeling (PR), low-attenuation plaque (LAP), napkin-ring sign (NRS), and spotty calcification (SC). FC thickness was assessed by OCT and PB by IVUS. High PB and thin FC were defined using the median values. Results A total of 549 plaques from 305 patients were analyzed (46.6% ACS, 18.7% women). CCTA-defined HRP was associated with both thin FC (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.30–3.18; P=0.021) and high PB (OR 3.59, 95% CI 2.35–5.49; P<0.001). NRS, LAP, and SC were associated with thin FC (all P<0.05), while NRS, LAP, and PR were associated with high PB (all P<0.05) (Figure, Panel A). When all three HRP features associated with thin FC were present, the predicted probability of thin FC increased to 72% (Figure, Panel B). When all three HRP features associated with PB were present, the predicted probability of high PB increased to 77% (Figure, Panel C). Conclusions NRS, LAP, and SC were associated with thin FC, whereas NRS, LAP, and PR were related to high PB. An increasing number of HRP features was associated with a progressively higher probability of thin FC and high PB. Distinguishing HRP features of thin FC or greater PB may improve prediction of plaque disruption and risk for developing acute coronary syndromes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreaggi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (46.6% acute coronary syndrome) (n=305). CCTA-defined high-risk plaque (HRP) vs. Plaques without CCTA-defined high-risk plaque features was evaluated on Thin fibrous cap (assessed by OCT) and high plaque burden (assessed by IVUS) (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.30-3.18, p=0.021). CCTA-defined high-risk plaque was significantly associated with OCT-assessed thin fibrous cap (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.30-3.18; P=0.021) and IVUS-assessed high plaque burden (OR 3.59, 95% CI 2.35-5.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: