Key result
AI-assisted CT reveals spirometry overestimates lung capacity by ~50% in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Why the study?
Conventional spirometry often misrepresents lung anatomy in patients with pulmonary hypertension. This study investigated whether AI-assisted CT volumetry provides a more accurate anatomical reference than spirometry and aimed to validate the Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) as a prognostic marker.
Does AI-assisted CT volumetry and the Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) provide a more accurate anatomical reference and stronger correlation with prognostic markers than conventional spirometry in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=90)
Does AI-assisted CT volumetry and the Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) provide a more accurate anatomical reference and stronger correlation with prognostic markers than conventional spirometry in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
AI-driven CT volumetry exposes substantial lung volume overestimation by conventional spirometry in pulmonary hypertension, while the Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) correlates strongly with hemodynamic severity and right heart strain in IPAH.
Background Conventional spirometry revolves around pulmonary function but often provides a misleading representation of lung anatomy in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We hypothesized that artificial intelligence (AI)-computer tomography (CT) volumetry provides a more accurate anatomical reference than spirometry, and we aimed to validate the Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) as a prognostic marker. Methods We evaluated 90 PH patients (including idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension - IPAH and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - CTEPH subgroups) using a multimodal approach: right heart catheterization, 6-minute walking test, and chest CT with automated AI-segmentation (Siemens Syngo.via). The dVCI was calculated as an integrated metric of exercise tolerance, heart rate response, and spirometric data. Results Automated CT volumetry revealed a profound overestimation of lung capacity by standard spirometry (p<0.001). Specifically, anatomical total lung capacity was lower than spirometric values by 48.0% in IPAH and 52.5% in CTEPH. Also, predictive accuracy for the volume-anatomy mismatch showed significant individual variance in CTEPH cases. In IPAH, traditional vital capacity (%) showed limited correlation with clinical status, but the dVCI exhibited strong (p<0.05) associations with key prognostic markers, such as NT-proBNP (r = -0.531), TAPSE (r = 0.427), mPAP (r = -0.423), highlighting dVCI as a potential non-invasive tool for longitudinal monitoring of IPAH progression. Conclusions In PH management, AI-driven CT volumetry exposes the limitations of traditional spirometry. The dVCI serves as a superior surrogate marker, reflecting both haemodynamic severity and right heart strain in IPAH more accurately than standard pulmonary function parameters.Figure1_Bland_Altman_VC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Progonov et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (including IPAH and CTEPH) (n=90). AI-assisted CT volumetry and Digital Vital Capacity Index (dVCI) vs. Conventional spirometry was evaluated on Anatomical total lung capacity vs spirometric values and correlation of dVCI with prognostic markers (NT-proBNP, TAPSE, mPAP) (r = -0.531 (NT-proBNP), r = 0.427 (TAPSE), r = -0.423 (mPAP), p=<0.001). AI-assisted CT volumetry showed spirometry overestimated lung capacity by 48.0%-52.5% (p<0.001), while dVCI strongly correlated with NT-proBNP (r=-0.531), TAPSE (r=0.427), and mPAP (r=-0.423) in IPAH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: