Key result
RF-CL matches pre-test probability for predicting obstructive CAD, with both improving after adding CACS.
Why the study?
After the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score (RF-CL) was introduced in 2024 to assess CAD risk in patients with chest pain and/or dyspnea, the predictive performance of pre-test probability (PTP) and RF-CL for diagnosing obstructive CAD on CCTA in a low-risk population needed evaluation.
Does the 2024 risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score (RF-CL) compared to pre-test probability (PTP), with and without coronary artery calcium score (CACS), improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on CCTA in low-risk outpatients with chest pain and/or dyspnea?
Observational (n=240)
No
Does the 2024 risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score (RF-CL) compared to pre-test probability (PTP), with and without coronary artery calcium score (CACS), improve the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on CCTA in low-risk outpatients with chest pain and/or dyspnea?
In low-risk outpatients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea, both pre-test probability and the 2024 risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score effectively predict obstructive CAD on CCTA, with diagnostic accuracy significantly improving when combined with coronary artery calcium scoring.
Background In 2024 risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score (RF-CL) was introduced, to assess the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest pain and/or dyspnea. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of both pre-test probability (PTP) and RF-CL in a low-risk population to diagnose obstructive CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods The study included 240 patients, without prior diagnosis of CAD, who underwent CCTA 2023-2024 due to chest pain and/or dyspnea at an outpatient cardiology clinic. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis on CCTA. Data on coronary angiography and cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia) were collected. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of PTP and RF-CL, with and without coronary artery calcium score (CACS), with the likelihood of obstructive CAD on CCTA. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were computed to assess predictive performance. Results The mean age was 59.9 years, and 55.4% of the cohort were women. Obstructive CAD was detected in 13.3% of the patients on CCTA, 10.4% underwent invasive coronary angiography and 7.5% had obstructive CAD. The mean PTP and RF-CL were 16.2 and 10.0, respectively. Both the PTP and the RF-CL model demonstrated similar predictive performance for obstructive CAD (AUC 0.77 vs 0.76; p=0,793). When CACS was added to the model, the predictive accuracy improved substantially for both the PTP (AUC 0.88; p<0.001) and the RF-CL model (AUC 0.88; p<0.001). Conclusions In this predominantly low-risk population both PTP and RF-CL were effective predictors of obstructive CAD on CCTA, with superior performance when combined with CACS.Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsTable 2 and Table 3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindgren et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease in low-risk patients with chest pain and/or dyspnea (n=240). Risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood score (RF-CL) vs. Pre-test probability (PTP) was evaluated on Obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis) on CCTA (AUC 0.76 vs 0.77, p=0.793). RF-CL and pre-test probability showed similar performance for predicting obstructive CAD on CCTA (AUC 0.76 vs 0.77; p=0.793), improving to AUC 0.88 (p<0.001) with CACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: