Why the study?
Icosapent ethyl reduces MACE in high-risk hypertriglyceridemic patients with emerging data indicating cardioprotective actions beyond lipid modulation, and elevated baseline pro-coagulant activity is linked to higher CV risk. Whether icosapent ethyl affects coagulation or fibrinolytic pathways was evaluated in this analysis.
Does icosapent ethyl reduce circulating coagulation biomarkers (such as tissue factor) and improve event-free survival in high-risk cardiovascular patients with recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina?
Does icosapent ethyl reduce circulating coagulation biomarkers (such as tissue factor) and improve event-free survival in high-risk cardiovascular patients with recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina?
Icosapent ethyl reduces circulating and endothelial tissue factor levels and improves event-free survival particularly among patients with elevated baseline tissue factor, offering a novel antithrombotic mechanism for the cardiovascular risk reduction observed in REDUCE-IT.
Introduction The Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) showed that icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in high-risk patients with hypertriglyceridemia. While IPE is approved as an adjunct to statins for triglyceride reduction, emerging data indicate additional cardioprotective actions beyond lipid modulation. As elevated baseline pro-coagulant activity is linked to higher cardiovascular (CV) risk, this analysis aimed to evaluate whether IPE, a highly purified ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), affects coagulation or fibrinolytic pathways. Methods This post hoc analysis examined a subset of high-risk patients from the REDUCE-IT (n=100 IPE; n=100 placebo) who had experienced myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the 12 months before randomization. Blood samples collected at baseline and after 2 years were analyzed using Luminex 200 technology to quantify circulating levels of tissue factor (TF), TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). Group comparisons were performed using generalized linear models. For the time-to-event analyses, patients were stratified by the median baseline TF level (46.5 pg/mL) across the entire cohort, resulting in four subgroups: placebo-low TF, placebo-high TF, IPE-low TF, and IPE-high TF. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to assess the first occurrence of the primary composite endpoint as defined in REDUCE-IT. Complementary in vitro experiments were conducted in primary human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) treated with increasing EPA concentrations prior to stimulation with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Protein expression of TF, TFPI, and PAI-1 were assessed by western blot. Results TF blood levels were reduced after 2 years in IPE-treated patients compared with placebo (median 49.4 and 55.8 pg/mL, p=0.046). Consistently, EPA (8×10-5 M) decreased TF protein expression in TNF-α–stimulated HAECs (p=0.032), whereas TFPI and PAI-1 levels were unaffected in patients or in vitro (Figure 1). Event-free survival varied across the four TF-stratified groups (log-rank p=0.022), with the placebo-high baseline TF group experiencing the highest incidence of events over time. This contrast was most evident when comparing placebo-high baseline TF patients with IPE treated-high baseline TF patients (red and gold curves, Figure 2). Conclusion IPE reduces circulating TF levels in a subset of high-risk CV patients of the REDUCE-IT; similarly, it reduces TF in HAECs exposed to TNF-α. Patients with higher baseline TF demonstrated more favorable event-free survival under IPE treatment, whereas the placebo-high baseline TF subgroup exhibites the greatest incidence of events. The findings herein offer an additional mechanistic explanation for the MACE reduction reported in REDUCE-IT and support an antithrombotic effect of IPE, especially among patients with high baseline TF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuenzli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: