Key result
Photon-counting CT-derived cFFR demonstrates ~85% accuracy for flow-limiting stenoses vs. invasive FFR.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of computed fractional flow reserve derived from photon-counting CT compared with invasive FFR needed evaluation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, particularly those with a high coronary calcification burden.
Does photon-counting CT-derived fractional flow reserve accurately identify hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses compared to invasive fractional flow reserve in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and severe coronary calcification?
Observational (n=87)
Blinded cFFR analysis
Does photon-counting CT-derived fractional flow reserve accurately identify hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses compared to invasive fractional flow reserve in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and severe coronary calcification?
Photon-counting CT-derived cFFR accurately detects hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses even in patients with severe coronary calcification (Agatston >1000), supporting its role as a reliable non-invasive gatekeeper for invasive angiography.
Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is established in clinical guidelines for diagnosing chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). New Photon-counting CT provides superior spatial resolution, markedly enhancing coronary lumen visualisation in calcified lesions. Computed fractional flow reserve (cFFR) enables a non-invasive functional evaluation of flow limitations, potentially reducing unnecessary diagnostic invasive coronary angiographies. Purpose This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cFFR derived from photon-counting computed tomography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) in CCS patients, with a specific focus on those with a high coronary calcification burden. Methods Consecutive CCS patients underwent both dual-source photon-counting CCTA and invasive coronary angiography between January 2024 and January 2025. cFFR analysis was performed using dedicated scientific software in a blinded manner. Flow-limiting stenoses were defined as invasive FFR ≤0.80 or angiographic stenosis >90%. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)) was evaluated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Agreement was assessed via Cohen's kappa (κ), interpreted according to Landis and Koch, while McNemar (p) tests evaluated systematic differences between methods. Results Analysis included 145 coronary vessels from 87 patients (77% male, mean age 70, range 40-92 years). The Coronary Artery Calcium Score was available for 64 patients (108 vessels) with a mean Agatston score of 1181. Overall group (n=145 vessels): Sensitivity was 89.3% (95% CI: 82.2–93.8%), specificity 69.7% (95% CI: 52.7–82.6%), accuracy 84.8% (95% CI: 79.0–90.7%), PPV 90.9% (95% CI: 84.1–94.9%), and NPV 65.7% (95% CI: 49.2–79.2%). Agreement was moderate (κ=0.577) with no systematic bias (p=0.832). In the high-risk subgroup (Agatston >1000, n=53 vessels from 29 patients), cFFR maintained excellent diagnostic performance with sensitivity 90.4% (95% CI: 78.3–97.5%), specificity 88.9% (95% CI: 51.8–99.7%), accuracy 90.6% (95% CI: 82.7–98.4%), PPV 97.6% (95% CI: 87.1–99.9%) and NPV 66.7% (95% CI: 34.9–90.1%). Agreement was substantial (κ=0.705; p=0.375). Mean radiation dose for CCTA was 7.5 mSv. Conclusions Photon-counting CT–derived cFFR accurately identifies haemodynamically significant coronary stenoses, even in patients with severe coronary calcification, demonstrating high concordance with invasive FFR and a high PPV. These findings support its role as a reliable non invasive gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography, addressing a major limitation of conventional CCTA in heavily calcified vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steinboeck et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) with high coronary calcification burden (n=87). Photon-counting CT-derived fractional flow reserve (cFFR) vs. Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for flow-limiting stenoses (invasive FFR ≤0.80 or angiographic stenosis >90%) (Accuracy 84.8%, 95% CI 79.0-90.7%, p=0.832). Photon-counting CT-derived cFFR yielded 84.8% accuracy (95% CI 79.0–90.7%) overall and 90.6% accuracy in severe calcification (Agatston >1000) compared to invasive FFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: