This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study investigates the coupled effects of extrusion temperature (300−400 °C) and extrusion ratio (6:1, 12:1, and 18:1) on the texture, mechanical behavior, and fracture behavior of a Mg−4.5Zn alloy. The alloy underwent solution treatment followed by extrusion. Microstructural analysis reveals that extrusion induces significant grain refinement through dynamic recrystallization (DRX), resulting in a heterogeneous structure characterized by necklace-type recrystallized regions. Lower extrusion temperatures and higher extrusion ratios promote finer DRXed grains due to increased stored energy and restricted grain growth. Texture analysis demonstrates a typical basal fiber texture, with its evolution depending on both extrusion temperature and ratio as a result of deformation-induced reorientation, DRX, grain rotation, and temperature-dependent slip activity. Mechanical testing demonstrates substantial improvements in both strength and ductility after extrusion, attributed to Hall−Petch strengthening and texture modification. The extruded alloy exhibits reduced tension–compression asymmetry compared with the as-cast condition, indicating mitigated plastic anisotropy. The optimal combination is achieved at 300 °C with an extrusion ratio of 18:1, yielding a tensile yield strength of 265 MPa, an ultimate tensile strength of 289 MPa, and an elongation of 16.5%. Furthermore, the ultimate compressive strength, compressive elongation, and microhardness reach 467.49 MPa, 27.86%, and 90.52 HV, respectively. Fractographic analysis confirms a transition from brittle cleavage fracture in the as-cast condition to ductile fracture after extrusion, which is associated with grain refinement. These findings elucidate the critical process–structure–property relationships in binary Mg−Zn alloys and provide guidance for optimizing extrusion parameters to enhance mechanical performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: