Key result
Pulsed field ablation for AF is linked to ~5-point lower 3D left atrial ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Pulsed field ablation is a non-thermal ablation modality for AF, but its impact on left atrial volume, function, and remodeling remains incompletely defined.
Does pulsed field ablation affect left atrial volume and function at 1-3 months follow-up in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=47)
Does pulsed field ablation affect left atrial volume and function at 1-3 months follow-up in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation?
Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with early (1-3 months) left atrial remodeling characterized by increased minimum volume, reduced volumetric performance (LAEF, reservoir, and contractile function), and decreased conduit strain despite stable maximum volume.
PFA was associated with early LA remodeling; hypothesis-generating for long-term outcomes versus thermal ablation.
Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal type of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), yet its impact on left atrial (LA) remodeling remains incompletely defined. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the changes in LA volume and function before and after PFA. Methods Consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing PFA as index ablation were prospectively enrolled between April 2024 and May 2025. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 2 weeks pre-ablation and 1-3 months post-ablation. LA volumes and derived indices (LA ejection fraction (LAEF) and phasic functions (reservoir, conduit, contractile)) were measured by two – dimensional (2DE) and three- dimensional (3DE) echocardiography. LA strain parameters were assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography. Changes between baseline and follow-up were assessed using paired statistical tests as appropriate. Results Forty-seven patients were included (66.9±9.4 years; 68.1% male gender), among whom 20 (42.6%) patients had persistent AF. LA maximum volume did not change significantly post-PFA by either 2DE (p = 0.264) or 3DE (p = 0.279). LA minimum volume showed a non-significant trend towards increase on 2DE (42.7 ± 21.1 ml vs. 49.8 ± 28,6 ml, p = 0.076) while a significant increase was observed on 3DE assessment (39.5 ± 17.4 ml vs 43.3 13.3 ml, p = 0.035) (Figure 1). LAEF decreased significantly on both 2DE (44.5 ± 14.1% vs. 40.0 ± 13.2%, p = 0.041) and 3DE (43.0 ± 10.7 % vs. 37.9 ± 7.9 %, p = 0.016). Volumetric reservoir and contractile functions declined significantly post- PFA (2DE reservoir 92.6 ± 56.2 % vs. 74.5 ± 37.9 %, p =0.044; 3DE reservoir 86.7 ± 39.2% vs. 65.7 ± 22. 4%, p = 0.008; 2DE contractile 34.7 ± 14.5% vs. 23.3 ± 11.9%, p< 0.001, 3DE contractile 33.3 ± 9.8 % vs 25.5 ± 9.4%, p <0.001), whereas conduit function did not change significantly either by 2DE (p=0.057) or 3DE echocardiography (p=0.054) (Figure 2). Strain analysis showed no significant change in LA reservoir (p=0.344) or contractile strain (p=0.098), but a significant reduction in LA conduit strain (-10.5 ± 4.0 % vs -8.1 ± 3.7 %, p<0.001). Conclusion PFA was associated with early LA remodeling characterized by increased LA minimum volume and reduced volumetric LA performance despite stable LA maximum volume, with a selective decline in LA conduit strain. Larger studies with serial imaging are warranted to define recovery trajectories and prognostic implications.Figure 1.LA volumes before and after PFAFigure 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motoc et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (n=47). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) vs. Pre-ablation baseline was evaluated on Changes in left atrial (LA) volume and function (including LA ejection fraction, phasic functions, and strain) (p=0.016). Pulsed field ablation for AF significantly reduced 3D left atrial ejection fraction (43.0% vs 37.9%, p=0.016) and increased 3D minimum volume (39.5 vs 43.3 ml, p=0.035) at 1-3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: