Key result
Point-of-care hs-cTn achieves ~99% sensitivity for single-test ACS rule-out in the ED.
Why the study?
New hs-cTn point-of-care devices may reduce time to diagnosis compared to central laboratory testing, but it remained unclear whether their diagnostic accuracy is comparable to that of central laboratory assays.
Do high-sensitivity cardiac troponin point-of-care (hs-cTn POC) assays provide reliable diagnostic accuracy for Acute Coronary Syndrome in adult patients presenting with chest pain at the emergency department?
Systematic Review
Do high-sensitivity cardiac troponin point-of-care (hs-cTn POC) assays provide reliable diagnostic accuracy for Acute Coronary Syndrome in adult patients presenting with chest pain at the emergency department?
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin point-of-care assays demonstrate high sensitivity (>98.8% to 99.8%) and are reliable for rapid single-test rule-out of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and very low troponin values.
Supports rapid single-test ACS rule-out in ED at low cutoffs; extends hs-cTn evidence to point-of-care platforms.
Background High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have significantly enhanced the diagnosis in patients suspected of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). New hs-cTn point-of-care (POC) devices, with a turnaround time <20 minutes, may reduce time to diagnosis compared to central laboratory testing. However, it remains unclear whether the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTn POC assays is comparable to that of central laboratory assays. Purpose We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of four hs-cTn POC assays to assess their potential for clinical implementation at the emergency department (ED). Methods We conducted a search in PubMed Central on 20 November 2025. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they investigated adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with chest pain suggestive of ACS and evaluated commercially available hs-cTn POC devices. Studies had to report diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV)) as an outcome measure. The search strategy identified 436 articles, of which 11 were included in this systematic review, describing four currently commercially available hs-cTn POC devices. Results The described hs-cTn POC assays demonstrated the best diagnostic accuracy when applied as a single test rule-out upon arrival at the ED. The Atellica VTLi demonstrated a sensitivity > 98.8% for troponin values <7 ng/l, and a specificity of 97.7% for troponin values > 52 ng/l. The i-STAT assay showed a sensitivity of 99.8% for troponin values <5 ng/l and a specificity 96.4% at troponin values > 25 ng/l. The Pathfast achieved a sensitivity > 99.1% for troponin values <4 ng/l and a specificity > 96.4% for troponin values ≥ 90 ng/l. VTLI, Pathfast and TriageTrue were also tested using the 99th percentile with a 0+1/2/3 hour troponin protocol, reporting sensitivities of 64.8-100.0% and specificities of 85.8-96.0%. Conclusion This systematic review indicates that hs-cTn POC assays are reliable for integration in the diagnostic pathways for patients presenting with chest pain at the ED, mainly when used for rapid rule out of ACS in patients with very low troponin values upon arrival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Backus et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin point-of-care (hs-cTn POC) assays (Atellica VTLi, i-STAT, Pathfast, TriageTrue) vs. Central laboratory hs-cTn testing was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value) for ACS. High-sensitivity POC troponin assays showed >98.8% sensitivity for single-test ACS rule-out at very low cutoffs (<4-7 ng/L) and >96.4% specificity at higher cutoffs upon ED arrival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: