Key result
Lower sublingual Microvascular Flow Index at first medical contact independently predicted advanced SCAI shock stage (OR 0.312, p=0.007) and composite adverse outcomes (OR 0.435; 95% CI 0.210-0.902).
Why the study?
The SCAI staging system does not directly reflect microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock, and whether sublingual microcirculatory parameters assessed at first medical contact in the emergency department correlate with SCAI stage and predict adverse outcomes remained unclear.
Does sublingual microcirculation assessment at first medical contact in the emergency department predict SCAI shock severity and composite adverse clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Observational (n=94)
No
Does sublingual microcirculation assessment at first medical contact in the emergency department predict SCAI shock severity and composite adverse clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock?
Early bedside sublingual microcirculatory assessment at emergency department presentation independently predicts shock severity and adverse clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock, offering incremental prognostic value beyond conventional SCAI staging.
Sublingual microvascular assessment at first contact may aid early prognostication in cardiogenic shock; leaves open whether it refines SCAI staging or guides therapy.
Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early risk stratification at first medical contact (FMC) in the emergency department (ED) is critical for the timely management of CS. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) staging system improves risk stratification but does not directly reflect microcirculatory dysfunction, a key determinant of tissue perfusion and organ failure, which may occur despite apparently preserved macrocirculation. Sublingual microcirculation imaging enables real-time bedside visualization of microvascular perfusion. Whether microcirculatory parameters correlate with SCAI stage and predict adverse outcomes in emergency CS patients remains unclear. Purpose To investigate whether sublingual microcirculatory parameters assessed in the emergency department are associated with SCAI shock stage and predict adverse clinical outcomes in CS. Methods This retrospective single-center study included consecutive CS patients who underwent sublingual microcirculation assessment in the ED at FMC. Microcirculatory parameters included Microvascular Flow Index (MFI), Heterogeneity Index (HI), Proportion of Perfused Vessels (PPV), Perfused Vessel Density (PVD), Red Blood Cell velocity (RBCv), and Perfused Boundary Region (PBR). Their associations with SCAI stage and composite adverse outcome were evaluated using Spearman correlation and logistic regression. The composite outcome included SCAI stage deterioration, in-hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support escalation, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation. Results From May 1st, 2025, to January 30th, 2026, a total of 94 patients were included (age 59±17 years; 67.0% male; median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction 27.5% [21.75%–35.25%]). SCAI distribution was A (25.5%), B (10.6%), C (58.5%), D (4.2%), and E (1.0%). Higher SCAI stages were associated with impaired microvascular flow, including lower MFI and RBC velocity, and increased flow heterogeneity. In univariate analysis, MFI, HI, and RBCv were associated with higher SCAI stages. In multivariate analysis, MFI remained independently associated with advanced SCAI stage (OR 0.312, 95% CI 0.134–0.729, p=0.007). Microcirculatory impairment was also associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Lower MFI (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.210–0.902, p=0.025) and higher HI (OR 5.193, p=0.035) were associated with composite adverse events in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, MFI remained an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.210–0.902, p=0.025). Conclusion Sublingual microcirculatory dysfunction is detectable at FMC in the ED and independently predicts CS severity and adverse clinical outcomes. Early microcirculatory assessment may provide incremental prognostic value beyond conventional staging, supporting improved risk stratification and early therapeutic decision-making in CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic shock (n=94). Sublingual microcirculatory parameters (specifically Microvascular Flow Index [MFI]) was evaluated on Composite adverse outcome (SCAI stage deterioration, in-hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support escalation, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation) (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.210-0.902, p=0.025). Lower sublingual Microvascular Flow Index at first medical contact independently predicted advanced SCAI shock stage (OR 0.312, p=0.007) and composite adverse outcomes (OR 0.435; 95% CI 0.210-0.902).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: