Key result
LAD-only assessment in ANOCA misclassifies ~29% of patients compared to multivessel testing.
Why the study?
Diagnostic protocols for ANOCA traditionally rely on single-vessel LAD interrogation assuming diffuse microvascular pathology, but emerging evidence suggests vasomotor dysfunction may be territory-specific.
Does systematic multivessel assessment of the LAD and RCA reduce diagnostic misclassification compared to a single-vessel (LAD-only) strategy in patients with ANOCA?
Observational (n=213)
Yes
Does systematic multivessel assessment of the LAD and RCA reduce diagnostic misclassification compared to a single-vessel (LAD-only) strategy in patients with ANOCA?
In patients with ANOCA, coronary vasomotor dysfunction exhibits significant spatial heterogeneity between the LAD and RCA, causing a traditional LAD-only interrogation strategy to misclassify 28.6% of patients compared to systematic multivessel assessment.
Background Diagnostic protocols for angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) traditionally rely on single-vessel interrogation—predominantly the left anterior descending artery (LAD)—based on the assumption that microvascular pathology is a diffuse phenomenon. However, emerging evidence suggests that vasomotor dysfunction may be territory-specific. Thus, we aimed to examine possible heterogeneity of coronary vasomotor dysfunction by systematic multivessel assessment in the nationwide J-CMD Registry in Japan. Methods We prospectively analyzed 213 patients from the J-CMD registry who underwent physiological and vasomotor assessment of both the LAD and the right coronary artery (RCA). Protocols included pharmacological spasm provocation and thermodilution-derived measurements of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Spatial concordance was assessed for epicardial vasospasm (EVS), microvascular spasm (MVS), and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD; CFR <2.5). CMD was further categorized into structural (IMR ≥25) or functional (IMR <25) subtypes. Mixed-type CMD was defined as inter-territory discordance in CMD subtype. Misclassification was defined as any diagnostic discrepancy between LAD-only strategy and a multivessel approach. Results At the patient level, EVS was present in 46.9%, MVS in 16.0%, and CMD in 41.3% (structural 26.3%, functional 8.0%, mixed-type 7.0%). Importantly, pronounced diagnostic discordance was observed between territories. Kappa statistics revealed poor agreement for EVS (κ=0.28) and negligible agreement for structural (κ=0.10) and functional CMD (κ=0.05). Although MVS showed moderate concordance (κ=0.59), overall diagnostic discordance (any parameter) affected 58.7% of patients. Consequently, LAD-only approach would have misclassified 28.6% of the cohort. In contrast, multivessel assessment reduced the proportion of patients with no identifiable dysfunction from 38.0% to 27.2%. Conclusions Coronary vasomotor dysfunction in ANOCA is characterized by significant spatial heterogeneity. Reliance on single-vessel evaluation could result in misclassification and incomplete phenotyping. Systematic multivessel interrogation is essential to demonstrate the full complexity of coronary vascular pathology and to facilitate precise and tailored therapeutic management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosokawa et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) (n=213). Multivessel coronary physiological and vasomotor assessment (LAD and RCA) vs. LAD-only single-vessel assessment strategy was evaluated on Overall diagnostic discordance (any parameter) and patient-level misclassification between LAD-only and multivessel assessment. Systematic multivessel assessment in ANOCA revealed 58.7% inter-territory diagnostic discordance, whereas an LAD-only strategy misclassified 28.6% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: