Key result
Positive PHQ-2 and GAD-2 screening linked to ~6.7-fold higher odds of depression in cardiac inpatients.
Why the study?
Depression and anxiety in patients with cardiac disease are common and independently associated with morbidity and mortality, prompting an evaluation of the feasibility, predictive value, and prevalence findings of a 3-step inpatient screening approach for depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder.
Observational (n=6,210)
May support brief mood screening in cardiac inpatients; leaves open effects on outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety in patients with cardiac disease are common and independently associated with morbidity and mortality. We aimed to explore the use of a 3-step approach to identify inpatients with cardiac disease with depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or panic disorder; understand the predictive value of individual screening items in identifying these disorders; and assess the relative prevalence of these disorders in this cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: To identify depression and anxiety disorders in inpatients with cardiac disease as part of a care management trial, an iterative 3-step screening procedure was used. This included an existing 4-item (Coping Screen) tool in nursing data sets, a 5-item screen for positive Coping Screen patients (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2], GAD-2, and an item about panic attacks), and a diagnostic evaluation using PHQ-9 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders anxiety disorder modules. Overall, 6210 inpatients received the Coping Screen, 581 completed portions of all 3 evaluation steps, and 210 received a diagnosis (143 depression, 129 GAD, 30 panic disorder). Controlling for age, sex, and the other screening items, PHQ-2 items independently predicted depression (little interest/pleasure: odds ratio [OR]=6.65, P<0.001; depression: OR=5.24, P=0.001), GAD-2 items predicted GAD (anxious: OR=4.09, P=0.003; unable to control worrying: OR=10.46, P<0.001), and the panic item predicted panic disorder (OR=49.61, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GAD was nearly as prevalent as depression in this cohort, and GAD-2 was an effective screening tool; however, panic disorder was rare. These results support the use of 2-step screening for depression and GAD beginning with a 4-item scale (GAD-2 plus PHQ-2). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Unique Identifier: NCT01201967. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01201967.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Celano et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease with depression, generalized anxiety disorder, or panic disorder (n=6,210). 3-step screening procedure (Coping Screen, PHQ-2/GAD-2/panic item, and PHQ-9/PRIME-MD) was evaluated on Diagnosis of depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or panic disorder (OR 6.65, p=<0.001). PHQ-2 and GAD-2 items independently predicted depression (OR 6.65, P<0.001) and generalized anxiety disorder (OR 10.46, P<0.001) among cardiac inpatients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: