Since 2019, income tax abuse cases in Estonia have been addressed under Section 5 1 of the Income Tax Act (Estonia) 2019 , which introduced a general anti-abuse rule (iGAAR). Unlike its predecessor, the new rule has become infamous for its ambiguous wording, which allows the arrangements to be disregarded and provides considerable latitude in their treatment. It introduces an understanding of taxation based on the taxpayer’s intent and moves away from the principle of taxation depending on economic substance corresponding to the legal form. The authors argue that the new iGAAR may fall short of the minimum threshold set by the Estonian Constitution for the legal clarity of a legal norm. The analysis identifies several characteristics of iGAAR that indicate that it may indeed face such a problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Künnapas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: