Tourist transport is evaluated as access infrastructure, yet some urban modes also function as attractions. This article develops a framework identifying this shift. Drawing on transport-tourism literature and Bandros in Bandung, it finds that tourist transport becomes an attraction when movement exposes the city as a sequence of sights, the mode carries symbolic identity, interpretation turns travel into place-based narrative, and service governance makes the experience legible, safe, and reliable. Bandros provides an empirical plausibility check, while walking and cycling tours illustrate cross-mode applicability, suggesting that tourist transport should be planned as experiential mobility infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wulung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: