Epoxy adhesives transfer load between structural components while introducing a thin, mechanically heterogeneous region whose response may depend on time,temperature, moisture, bond-line geometry, loading rate, and manufacturing history. This paper presents a physics-based modeling framework for analyzing epoxybonded structural joints. It combines continuum mechanics, linear and nonlinearviscoelasticity, progressive damage, cohesive-zone fracture, mixed-mode interaction,and fatigue evolution. The framework is intended for implementation within finiteelement analysis and for calibration using mechanical and fracture tests. Governingrelations are provided with definitions of their principal variables and parameters.The proposed model separates bulk adhesive deformation from interfacial ornear-interface fracture. A generalized Maxwell representation describes time-dependentresponse; a scalar damage variable represents stiffness degradation; and a mixedmode cohesive law accounts for crack initiation and propagation. Environmentaleffects are introduced through temperature- and moisture-dependent material parameters rather than treated as universal constants. A calibration and validationplan is outlined using tensile, shear, double-cantilever-beam, end-notched-flexure,and joint-level tests. No numerical predictions are claimed: material constantsmust be identified for the specific adhesive, adherends, surface preparation, cure,geometry, and service environment. The framework is therefore a research methodology, not a substitute for project-specific testing or applicable structural designrequirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaled Aldhufri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: