Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models, including tumor spheroids and organoids, more accurately recapitulate the structural and physiological complexity of tissues than conventional monolayer cultures, making them valuable platforms for cancer research and drug screening. Volume is a biologically relevant parameter for monitoring growth dynamics and treatment response; however, its quantification often relies on manual image analysis, which is labor-intensive, subjective, and prone to inter-operator variability. Here, we introduce SpheroQuaNNt, a web-based application for automated spheroid segmentation and volume estimation using a U-Net Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). SpheroQuaNNt enables analysis of heterogeneous morphologies through image-based segmentation and provides a web-based interface for volume measurement. The model was trained and validated using 615 microscopy images representing diverse 3D culture systems, including monoculture and hybrid spheroids generated from human and canine tumor cell lines and human embryonic kidney cells, as well as tumor organoids derived from human melanoma lesions. After 30 training epochs, the model achieved 99.35% accuracy during training and 98.56% on the validation dataset, with an average Dice Score of 0.9478 for supervised validation. The method accurately captured volume variations across heterogeneous spheroids, although those presenting marked density heterogeneity between the core and periphery with a dark peripheral margin remained more challenging. Estimated volumes showed strong agreement with measurements performed independently by two experts, supporting its reliability. Overall, SpheroQuaNNt provides a standardized solution for volumetric characterization of spheroids and organoids, reducing operator-dependent variability and supporting high-throughput drug screening and quantitative analysis of 3D cell culture models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: