3D printing of complex geometries remains limited by the trade‐off between printing resolution and surface quality: fused deposition modeling allows efficient solvent‐based surface smoothing but offers limited resolution, whereas vat‐photopolymerization provides high resolution but typically uses crosslinked thermosets that restrict solvent‐induced surface reflow. Here, we present a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)‐based photoresin, formulated from polymeric PMMA, methyl methacrylate, and butyl methacrylate, that enables high‐resolution digital light processing (DLP) while retaining thermoplastic characteristics. A wax additive suppressed rapid monomer evaporation, enabling stable printing on a benchtop DLP system. Incorporating 15 wt% butyl methacrylate prevented visible solvent‐induced cracking over 14 days, and a 50:50 (v/v) acetone:2‐propanol mixture gave effective smoothing after 120 min. This approach reduced the staircase‐induced surface roughness from 2.33 µm to 129 nm (86 × 86 µm 2 evaluation area), while local measurements on treated microlenses (10 × 10 µm 2 ) yielded S q = 12.8 ± 4.4 nm. The optical transmittance of 2 mm thick samples increased from approximately 30% to 80% in the visible range. The presented strategy combines high‐resolution vat‐polymerization with effective surface smoothing and provides a viable route towards smooth and optically transparent PMMA components, particularly for illumination optics and applications requiring complex geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heydarpour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: