Reliable screening of agricultural water-use anomalies over large areas remains challenging because verified event labels and field observations are rarely available. We present AI4WaterGuard, a multi-source Earth Observation and artificial intelligence framework for unsupervised water-use anomaly screening across Cyprus. Using 617,862 records from 1,974 centroids across six hydrological years, six primary detector families were assessed under nested temporal cross-validation with training-consistent scaling, validity-aware scoring, and harmonised temporal support. Among the five centroid-sequence detectors, the convolutional neural network autoencoder showed the strongest response to the strong-reference controlled synthetic proxy, achieving Average Precision of 0.893± 0.130 and Proxy F1 of 0.880± 0.100 . The spatially explicit convolutional long short-term memory variational autoencoder was evaluated at finer land-pixel-sequence granularity and interpreted descriptively. Across five perturbation patterns and three severities, the convolutional neural network autoencoder achieved an equal-scenario mean Average Precision of 0.342, declining to 0.088 for weak perturbations. These synthetic metrics quantify controlled-proxy sensitivity, not field-validated detection performance. Operational post-processing on 1,157 WorldCover-eligible centroids combined threshold sensitivity, 1,000 exact-count randomisations, a primary Top-50 inspection-prioritisation queue with a nested Top-20 high-priority subset, and common-cadence spatiotemporal events. The resulting screening priorities require independent administrative and field evidence to establish physical cause or legal status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakoulli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: