Arranging the positive integers on twenty-four spokes turns factorisation into a question about residue pairs and integer ring coordinates. We give the complete unordered factor-residue table, derive a ring equation exactly equivalent to divisibility, and describe multiples of a fixed prime as a periodic clock on each spoke. Digital roots and last digits refine the coordinates to residue classes modulo 72 and 360; they do not, in general, determine whether a target is composite. An elementary obstruction proves that no classifier using only a fixed periodic state can distinguish all primes from composites. A general formula counts unordered residue pairs for any wheel modulus, and a minimum-product bound explains why one natural residue filter eventually becomes ineffective. Deterministic computations, supplied with a standard-library verification script, check the identities and illustrate the equivalence with wheel-based trial division. The contribution is a unified visual and algebraic exposition; no new general factorisation algorithm or improvement in complexity is claimed. Status: Expository preprint; not peer reviewed. The accompanying supplement contains the editable manuscript, diagrams, verification script, and exact results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raahil Shah (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: