Key result
Preprocedural WBC independently predicted attenuated 6-month LDL-C reduction after STEMI (β=+0.069, p<0.001; OR 1.16 for <30% reduction, p=0.004), whereas genetic variation did not (p>0.60).
Why the study?
Inter-individual variability in LDL-C reduction after STEMI remains incompletely explained, and the role of acute inflammatory burden alongside pharmacogenetic variation in determining statin response is less well defined.
Does systemic inflammatory burden or genetic variation predict attenuated LDL-C reduction at 6 months in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=93)
Does systemic inflammatory burden or genetic variation predict attenuated LDL-C reduction at 6 months in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
In STEMI patients, systemic inflammatory burden at presentation (preprocedural WBC), rather than genetic variation, independently predicts an attenuated LDL-C reduction at 6 months.
Background Inter-individual variability in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains incompletely explained. Although pharmacogenetic variation has been proposed as a determinant of atorvastatin response, the role of acute inflammatory burden in the setting of STEMI is less well defined. Purpose To evaluate clinical and genetic determinants of LDL-C reduction 6 months after STEMI. Methods We studied 93 consecutive STEMI patients with lipid assessment at baseline and 6 months. Absolute LDL-C reduction (ΔLDL = LDL₆M − LDL_baseline) and achievement of ESC guideline targets were analysed. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models included baseline LDL-C, age, sex, smoking status, statin intensity, and preprocedural white blood cell count (WBC). Comprehensive genetic profiling (>300 lipid- and pharmacokinetic-related variants) was assessed using candidate gene scores, genetic burden models, unsupervised clustering, and penalized regression (Elastic Net with nested cross-validation). Results Median LDL-C reduction was −1.49 mmol/L (range −4.09 to −0.01). However, 33% of patients failed to achieve ≥30% LDL reduction, 19% showed an absolute reduction of <1.0 mmol/L, and 44% remained above 1.4 mmol/L at 6 months. Baseline LDL-C was the strongest predictor of LDL reduction (β = −0.511, p < 0.001). Importantly, preprocedural WBC independently predicted an attenuated LDL response (β = +0.069 per 1×10⁹/L increase, p < 0.001), with the model explaining 42.6% of the variability in ΔLDL (R² = 0.426). WBC consistently predicted poor response across all definitions (e.g., OR 1.16 for <30% reduction, p = 0.004). In contrast, none of the genetic approaches improved prediction beyond that provided by clinical variables (all p > 0.60). No stable genetic signature of impaired statin response was identified. Conclusion In STEMI patients, systemic inflammatory burden at presentation independently predicts attenuated LDL-C reduction at 6 months, whereas extensive genetic variation does not. These findings support a state-dependent, inflammation-modulated model of lipid-lowering response in acute coronary disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kupstytė-Krištaponė et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=93). Preprocedural white blood cell count (WBC) and genetic variation (>300 lipid- and pharmacokinetic-related variants) was evaluated on Absolute LDL-C reduction at 6 months and failure to achieve >=30% LDL-C reduction (OR 1.16, p=0.004). Preprocedural WBC independently predicted attenuated 6-month LDL-C reduction after STEMI (β=+0.069, p<0.001; OR 1.16 for <30% reduction, p=0.004), whereas genetic variation did not (p>0.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: