Key result
Nanopore long-read sequencing matches conventional genetic testing with ~100% concordance for clinically relevant variants.
Why the study?
Current genetic testing strategies for cardiovascular diseases rely on integrating multiple technologies to maximize diagnostic yield. Long-read sequencing holds promise as a comprehensive stand-alone diagnostic approach, motivating an evaluation of its concordance and performance against standard testing.
Does Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing improve diagnostic concordance and variant detection compared to standard multi-technology genetic testing in patients with genetic cardiovascular diseases?
Observational (n=509)
Does Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing improve diagnostic concordance and variant detection compared to standard multi-technology genetic testing in patients with genetic cardiovascular diseases?
Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing accurately identifies all clinically relevant variants detected by conventional multi-platform genetic testing workflows while improving structural variant detection, supporting its use as a simplified stand-alone diagnostic tool in genetic cardiovascular diseases.
LRS may enable single-platform genetic testing in CV diseases; leaves open superiority to current multi-technology SRS strategies in routine diagnostics.
Background Genetic testing represents a fundamental step in the diagnostic workflow for patients affected by genetic cardiovascular diseases. Current testing strategies rely on the integration of multiple technologies to maximize diagnostic yield, with short-read sequencing (SRS) platforms playing a central role. However, the development of long-read sequencing (LRS) technologies holds the promise of providing a comprehensive, all-in-one diagnostic approach capable of overcoming the limitations of existing methodologies. Purpose We assessed the suitability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) LRS as a stand-alone diagnostic tool, evaluating its concordance with standard testing for clinically relevant variant detection and its potential to improve diagnostic performance. Methods We analyzed 509 samples using the ONT LRS platform. All samples had previously undergone comprehensive genetic testing workflow comprising Illumina-based SRS, Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). ONT-based results were compared against this reference standard to evaluate diagnostic concordance and added value. Results ONT-based analysis successfully identified all clinically relevant variants detected by the conventional diagnostic workflow. Moreover, it exhibited advantages over SRS in both mapping of difficult genomic regions and detection of copy number and structural variants (Figure). Conclusions Our findings support the implementation of ONT long-read sequencing as a reliable and comprehensive stand-alone technology for genetic testing in cardiovascular diseases, offering enhanced detection of complex and structural genomic variants and the potential to substantially simplify current diagnostic workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tescari et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Genetic cardiovascular diseases (n=509). Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing (LRS) vs. Conventional diagnostic workflow (Illumina-based SRS, Sanger sequencing, MLPA, and aCGH) was evaluated on Diagnostic concordance for clinically relevant variant detection. Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing identified 100% of clinically relevant variants detected by the conventional testing workflow across 509 samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: