Why the study?
Nuclear medicine physicians play a central role in diagnosing transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy using bone scintigraphy, prompting an assessment of their current acquisition protocols and reporting patterns in France.
While French nuclear medicine physicians largely adhere to guideline-recommended SPECT and Perugini grading protocols for ATTR-CM scintigraphy, critical reporting gaps remain regarding the need to exclude monoclonal gammopathy and recommend cardiology re-evaluation.
High adherence to late planar imaging supports reliable scintigraphy quality; leaves open whether reporting variability affects ATTR-CA diagnostic accuracy.
Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is increasingly diagnosed using bone scintigraphy. Nuclear medicine (NM) physicians play a central role in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. The DIAM-ATTR national survey aimed to assess current practices and reporting patterns for diagnosing ATTR-CM among NM physicians in France. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all NM physicians in France between March and May 2024. The survey addressed scintigraphy acquisition protocols, radiotracer use, image interpretation, and reporting habits for suspected ATTR-CM. Among the 774 NM physicians invited, 100 completed the survey (12.9%). Most respondents adhered to the recommended acquisition protocols, including late planar imaging (99%) and routine Perugini grading (98%). Single photon emission computed tomography imaging was consistently performed (89% for patients with Perugini Grade 1 uptake and 85% for Grades 2–3). However, reporting practices varied: only 49% of respondents mentioned the need to screen for monoclonal gammopathy when the Perugini was Grade 1, and only 17% systematically advised re-evaluation by a cardiologist. Respondents identified standardization of imaging protocols and reporting content as key areas for improvement. In France, NM physicians largely follow guidelines for ATTR-CM scintigraphy, especially regarding the use of SPECT and Perugini grading. However, gaps remain in reporting, notably for excluding monoclonal gammopathy and guiding Grade 1 cases. Improved education, collaboration, and standardized reporting are needed to further optimize diagnosis and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyafil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: